Okay, the user wants me to translate "spoon-feeds" into Swedish. Let me think about the correct translation.
First, "spoon-feeds" is a verb, probably in the present tense. The base word is "spoon-feed," which means to give someone information in a way that doesn't require them to think critically, like feeding them with a spoon. In Swedish, the equivalent expression might be "få mat med sked" or "få information på ett förenklat sätt." But I need to check if there's a standard translation for this idiom.
Looking up "spoon-feed" in a Swedish dictionary, the direct translation might be "skedföda," but that's not a common word. Alternatively, the phrase "få mat med sked" is more literal but might not capture the figurative meaning. However, since the user's instruction is to translate the content, even if it's an idiom, I should stick to a direct translation unless it's a known phrase in Swedish.
Wait, the user also mentioned that if the content is already in Swedish, leave it unchanged. Since "spoon-feeds" is English, I need to translate it. The most accurate translation would be "skedföda" as a verb, but I'm not sure if that's commonly used. Alternatively, using the phrase "få mat med sked" as a verb might be more natural. However, in Swedish, the verb form might be "skedföda" or "föda med sked." Let me confirm.
After checking, "spoon-feed" as a verb in Swedish is often translated as "föda med sked" or "skedföda." Since the user wants the translation, I'll go with "skedföda" as the verb form. So "spoon-feeds" would be "skedföder" in the third person singular. But wait, the original is "spoon-feeds" which is the third person singular. So the correct translation would be "skedföder." However, I need to make sure that's the correct conjugation. Alternatively, maybe "föder med sked" is more common. But I think "skedföder" is the direct translation. I'll go with that.
skedföder