defamations

the company faced numerous defamations online after the product launch.

he filed a lawsuit against the website for publishing false defamations.

the politician denied the baseless defamations made by his opponent.

the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding the defamations damaging.

she sought legal counsel to address the ongoing stream of online defamations.

the journalist retracted the article after realizing it contained serious defamations.

the investigation revealed a coordinated campaign of targeted defamations.

he warned against spreading unsubstantiated rumors and potential defamations.

the witness testified about the devastating impact of the public defamations.

the judge dismissed the case due to lack of evidence supporting the defamations.

the social media platform removed the accounts spreading malicious defamations.