nonapportionability

the court affirmed the principle of nonapportionability in its landmark ruling on damages.

legal scholars continue to debate the doctrine of nonapportionability in tort law.

the contract explicitly stated the rule of nonapportionability for shared liabilities.

critics argue that the concept of nonapportionability creates unfair burdens on defendants.

several jurisdictions have abandoned the traditional nonapportionability approach in favor of comparative fault.

the plaintiff invoked the doctrine of nonapportionability to seek full compensation.

this case represents a significant challenge to established nonapportionability principles.

the legislative committee is reviewing the issue of nonapportionability in insurance law.

legal practitioners must understand the implications of nonapportionability when drafting agreements.

the ruling eliminated the absolute nonapportionability standard that had governed the field.

scholars have written extensively about the historical development of nonapportionability doctrine.

the problem of nonapportionability arises when multiple parties contribute to a single harm.